A nice discussion on Michael S. Feathers blog.
Jim Weirich observes:
The original LSP is defined in terms of types and subtypes, not classes and subclasses. In Ruby, we try to remind people that type is not related to class. It seems to me that LSP still applies to dynamic languages, even if there is no direct language construct for type.
Also a link to dynamic/static type contracts (interfaces).
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment